G-D Ap­pears (Exclusively) Female

to me: pouring the story of creation with sense

while your mile­age may vary and ex­pec­ta­tions play a role¹ as de­scribed in psalm 123:2, but you may please read the next two ei­ther.

isaiah 66:13

כְּאִ֕ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֥ר אִמֹּ֖ו תְּנַחֲמֶ֑נּוּ כֵּ֤ן אָֽנֹכִי֙ אֲנַ֣חֶמְכֶ֔ם

(en.: ‘as a moth­er com­forts her child, so will i com­fort you, ..’)

1. af­ter hate and cru­el­ty of cow­ard­ly and in­hu­man groups of (ul­tra-)nazi ter­ror­ists² made a god in­evitable (turn­ing those men in­to a beau­ti­ful al­le­go­ry of a de­gen­er­at­ed pa­tri­archy lat­er on).

2. [השם] first en­coun­tered in jun, 2025, af­ter get­ting pre­pared.³ re­fer­ring to her­self as (not to be spoken out loud) íːvə⁴ (in IPA):

   exodus 20 (שְׁמוֹת):6

   לֹא תִשָּׂא אֶת-שֵׁם-יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ, לַשָּׁוְא

   (en.: ‘thou shalt not take the name of YHWH thy god in vain’)

   often re­ferred here to as יי (or ASCII “) for a lot more rea­sons than try­ing to avoid ridicu­lous gen­der dis­cus­sions.

3. her face she did not show (the one paint­ing it, i want to see). the rel­e­vant part from ex­o­dus 33:20 might bet­ter be ‘trans­lat­ed’ as «.. how do you in­tend to live, are you cer­tain of me?», imho. con­vinc­ing me in lieu, most el­e­gant and un­ob­tru­sive, that she is ex­alt­ed above all

4. when look­ing to­wards the hori­zon from an up­per floor of a build­ing, es­ti­mat­ing un­count­able pa­ra­me­ters over com­ing thou­sands of years, i receive a ‘passt’ in ger­man by YHWH/g-d, mean­ing ‘suits’ or ‘fits’ and that she does­n’t think that i have to worry either.

5. i sus­pect that mo­ses sim­ply mis­heard the name of YHWH/g-d, under stress, hunger, fa­tigue, and that she proves her beau­ti­ful cre­ation by the fal­li­bil­i­ty of her chil­dren:

   exo­dus 3:14:

   וַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֔ה אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה וַיֹּ֗אמֶר כֹּ֤ה תֹאמַר֙ לִבְנֵ֣י

   יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה שְׁלָחַ֥נִי אֲלֵיכֶֽם׃

   mean­ing:

   and god said to mo­se, «ehyeh-asher-ehyeh, ..»

   [note: bible trans­lation is «i am that i am»]

   con­tin­u­ing, «thus shall you say to the is­raelites, ehyeh sent me to you.»

   an ‘i am who you think i am’ i re­ceived too, but the next: the name of g-d seems to sound like ‘i am’ in heb­rew (or ancient egyptian?) and מֹשֶׁה/mo­se (a heb­rew speak­er?), might have missed her (not to be spoken out loud) name: ehyeh ⇨ íːvə (in IPA, or YaH­WeH).

   so, by the same time, he not just prov­ed the ex­is­tence of g-d so au­then­tic fal­li­ble, but him­self as be­ing a true prophet as well as the תָּנָ״ךְ (tanakh!?) be­ing true too. ❤️

   [amend of apr, 2026] was YHWH proving her own existence and that of her creation over the fallibility of her children? me, being an agnostic for 47 years, i didn’t really know the bible (only for iconographic purposes while studying art history).

   #TO­DO it is ok for (some of) us to say her name out loud as long as it is em­bed­ded in dig­ni­ty?

6. the name of g-d means ‘love’/‘pas­sion’?

   exo­dus 34:14:

   כִּ֛י לֹ֥א תִֽשְׁתַּחֲוֶ֖ה לְאֵ֣ל אַחֵ֑ר כִּ֤י יְהוָה֙ קַנָּ֣א שְׁמֹ֔ו אֵ֥ל קַנָּ֖א הֽוּא׃

   is trans­lated into modern eng­lish bibles with ‘for you shall not wor­ship any other god, for the LORD [amend: it is writ­ten «YHWH»], whose name is jeal­ous, is a jeal­ous god’.

   or: whose name means «zeal», a zeal­ous g-d?
   هوى (ara­bic h.w.y) roots here, where هوايا (arabic hawaya) de­rives from?⁵
   mean­ing ‘love’, ‘af­fec­tion’, ‘pas­sion’ and/or ‘de­sire’.

by all means: my ideal of an al­mighty cre­ator/cre­atress (by co­in­ci­dence)^😂, i just never was able to imag­ine.

1. in these di­vine room or sur­round­ings it seems as if one not only has to take mood, prob­a­bil­i­ty, per­cep­tion incl. its in­ter­pre­ta­tions, re­la­tions and its flow (hebrew רוח הקודש, chinese 氣?) in­to ac­count, but own ex­pec­ta­tions as well. in fact, they play an ex­tra­or­di­nary role.
and then there’s her prov­i­dence (chinese 道?) in gen­er­al. does she/YHWH/god ‘take pro­pos­als’? like in ‘shap­ing des­tiny’?

2. misog­y­nist, an­ti­se­mit­ic, oc­cult/es­o­teric (sa­tan­ic?) group(s)of killers and/or rapists (coerc­ing in gen­er­al) as well as (ul­tra)nazi ter­ror­ists from the shad­ows with­out indi­ca­tion of phys­i­cal exis­tence, thus, un­til proven oher­wise, no liv­ing, feel­ing/think­ing enti­ties.but in gen­er­al: such a pro­nounced pa­tri­archy is­n’t good for any­one, imo, also not for men either (ex­cept may­be a very few?).

3. my way of prepa­ra­tion to en­counter YHWH/god:

[from aug^15th, 2020, mün­chen] celiba­cy,
[feb^22nd, 2025, madrid] un­der­stand­ing the in­evitability for an almighty god,
[east­er, apr^20th, 2025, praha] the cel­e­bra­tion of yēšūaʿ’s res­ur­rec­tion,
[east­er mon, apr^21st, 2025, ber­lin] break­ing the fast with yeshua,
[white sun, apr^27th, 2025, paris] pu­rifi­ca­tion (on a white sun­day),
[apr^28th, 2025, paris] a wit­nessed ‘kind of con­cep­tion’ and
[may^15th, 2025, ber­lin] a (com­plete?) pu­rifi­ca­tion.

4. the name of g-d, imho (or, not to be spoken out loud: IEVE in german), but she kin­da fools me around a bit, pun­ning over ver­sions of the name: her name for ‘I [..?] EVE’. the (pre-bib­li­cal) let­ter equiv­a­lents of the name by go­ing back from the he­brew al­pha­bet via the phoeni­cian to the pro­to-sinaitic (or caananite) let­ters:

re­mark­able are the two dif­fer­ent signs for the later let­ter ep­silon, fad­ing away very early even with­in the egypt­ian hi­ero­glyphs? but some­how i think™ it mat­ters for the name of g-d: «the preacher» and «the wor­shiper» look sim­i­lar but do have a very dif­fer­ent mean­ing, imho. and so i think, this early in­scrip­tion builds a beau­ti­ful al­le­go­ry made of «hand», «preach­er», «birds»/«poultry» & «war­shiper» to de­scribe the name of YHWH/g-d as an­oth­er word for «pas­sion/love».
[note: by writ­ing the 2nd E in her name in ital­ic, i try to take the two dif­fer­ent mean­ings of the pre-ep­silon let­ter into con­sid­er­a­tion.]

5. knohl, i. (2019). YHWH: the orig­i­nal ara­bic mean­ing of the name. thetorah.com