LVCIFER is neither a DIABOLVS nor a Śāṭān &c. per se

but just a male angel: the morning star, guiding them to yēšūaʿ?

φως­φό­ρος/LV­CIFER/לוציפר, VENVS, son of the dawn & her­ald of the light is no διάβολος (DIABOLUS/devil) nor a שָׂטָן (śāṭān) &c. per sē. but just a male an­gel, hav­ing the worst rep­u­ta­tion in the (known) uni­verse. may­be a demon to some, a fallen an­gel to the same, sin­ners & sa­tanists.

yəšaʿyāhū 14:12:

אֵ֛יךְ נָפַ֥לְתָּ מִשָּׁמַ֖יִם הֵילֵ֣ל בֶּן־שָּׁ֑חַר נִגְדַּ֣עְתָּ לָאָ֔רֶץ חוֹלֵ֖שׁ עַל־גּוֹיִֽם:

(en.: ‘how you have fall­en from heav­en, said hillel ben-sahar; you have been brought down to the earth, a bur­den to the na­tions.’)

the story is about a fal­len king of baby­lon. does LVCIFER even ap­pear in the tanakh?
[amend^prs.] his whole (known) iden­ti­ty is man made. why should there be a fight bet­ween an­gels? el is שדאי (om­nipo­tent). it’s the pre­server­esses of the cre­ation who ban­ish sa­tans to hell every day.

rea­gan once stated ‘it takes two to tango.’ no light with­out dark­ness? no good with­out evil? no great­ness with­out small squares? on a more reg­u­lar ba­sis: venus to some, devil to others. did he, the morning star, led the kings to yēšūaʿ? did he vis­it mary prior, be­cause of an an­gel be­ing male?

© 2004 ger­hard hü­de­pohl: venus and the moon over paranal